For the purpose of this debate, ‘responsive advocacy’ refers to social movements aggressively engaging with and disproving misinformation and false claims propagated by oppositional institutions. Examples include the LGBTQ+ movement publicly explaining why queer inclusion does not increase AIDS/HIV rate.
‘Parallel advocacy’ refers to a strategy of disengaging with the propaganda of oppositional institutions and rather aiming to garner public empathy. Such advocacy uses visceral images of suffering and emotional appeals and discusses the difficulties and discrimination minority individuals face.